TEN FOUR OVER AND OUT!
This country is so predictable! In an election year you get the three Gs, "Gays, Guns and God", and of course, a healthy dosage of "abortion". Most sheeple, they vote solely based on these issues, paying no mind to how nothing changes and they're continuously lured in by the same divisive topics.
The United States of Amnesia...
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/27/politics/supreme-court-abortion-texas/index.html
Got to love the 5 to 3 vote or 523
ReplyDeleteFive hundred twenty three = 117
Abortion = 94
Aspartame = 94
Guilty = 94
Today has 49 numerology, the reflection of 94
Delete6+27+16= 49
5 3 vote: a religious ruling
ReplyDelete53 -- (Religion, Lamb, Shabbat, Cain, Hell, Monk, Wiccan)
53 (David Koresh)
Delete23 years ago was the Branch Dividian Fiasco. It came on 4/19/1993. 4/19 is a holiday to Moloch (Ba'al) a
Spring time fertility deity known for his special fondness for children.
This year the holiday fell on 4/19/2016 for 69 day till 6/27/2016. If you remember there as a quite to-do about setting Ba'al temples at several cities around the world. A demonstration of the establishments commitment to the welfare of children everywhere.
1993 (93) Saturn.
69 is also a Saturn number.
If still have your old copy of Bulfinch's Mythology you saved from High School, you can read that Saturn also had a special relationship with his children, trying to kill them when they were born.
Notice how 4/19/2016 breaks down
4/19/2016 - 4+19+20+16 = 59 (Kill, Good Friday,Obama care)
4/19/2016 - 4+19+2+1+6 = 32 (America)
4/19/2016 - 4+1+9+2+1+6 = 23 (23 years ago)
4/19/16 - 4+19+16 = 39
Also notice 6/27/2016:
6/27/2016 - 6+27+20+16 = 69 (69 days ago)
6/27/2016 - 6+27+2+1+6 = 42 (Freemason)
6/27/2016 - 6+2+7+2+1+6 = 24
6/27/16 - 6+27+16 = 49
If you haven't noticed 23 and 69 are related
3*23 = 69
I thought the dissenting opinion was interesting by Thomas...
ReplyDelete"As the Court applies whatever standard it likes to any given case, nothing but empty words separates our constitutional decisions from judicial fiat."
"judicial fiat" = 51(EO)
Funny how the same 'logic' Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan, Kennedy, and Sotomayor use to support this re-decision (whose case should have not been re-adjudicated as there was no 'new' information to be reconsidered) will not likely be used when considering 2nd Amendment issues.
Funny how that works (or doesn't).