** "Cioclovina Calvaria" = 118 rr ** "Romania" = 118 ro ** "Thirty-Three Thousand Year" = 118 red "Thirty-Three Thousand" = 96 red ... However, there were -- "No Bones" = 33 rr ... just a -- "Skull And No Bones" = 227 ro, *83 rr ... supposedly proving -- "Homicide Is Human" = *83 red Which is what this "study" claims, specifically citing -- "Violent Interpersonal Behaviour And Murder" = 222 rr As a naturally-occurring human trait.
"Research" = 77 eo, * 41 red "Skull And Bones" = * 41 red "Science" = * 41 rr
This propaganda piece is out to convince readers that humans are naturally violent towards each other -- & always have been. And this assertion is based solely upon a single skull (of dubious age & origin), & their pseudo-CSI "research" that posits a scenario which NO ONE could possibly know For A Fact. The conclusions drawn are 100% supposition -- (& the entire story is likely to be 100% fiction) -- which reveals this bogus "discovery" to be yet another Behavioral Engineering Tool. Clearly the "goal" is to cement the belief into people's minds that ALL ("common") humans have a natural propensity for violence -- that it's part of our DNA & the "proof" is as old as time.
This is meant to encourage future support for Pre-Crime tactics & the equally fraudulent Theoretical claim that Violence Is In Our DNA. "Theoretical" = 116 eo ... mirror of 911
Don't even get me started on the implications of how a "Skull And NO Bones" (supposedly from "common" man's "ancestor") relates to "Skull AND Bones" ... a group who blatantly purports to be Superior to All Other Humans ... despite having hypocritically proven themselves (in Fact), to be among the Most Bloodthirsty & Murderous "humans" that ever existed.
And note the Supreme Irony of "research" claiming to have solved a "murder" from 33,000 years ago ... while every day we're presented with reports about sudden, "inexplicable" celebrity deaths -- unsolvable & mysterious (until the familiar causes of "drugs" or "cancer" are trotted out ...). Though sometimes they don't even bother to do that.
But, we're supposed to believe this (fictional) ancient homicide scenario -- without question -- because it's being presented by "Scientific Experts", who conveniently provide both the imagery & narrative for us ... in order to squelch the TRUE & ACTUAL NATURE OF HUMANS -- which is to BE SKEPTICAL. :D ;D
** "Cioclovina Calvaria" = 118 rr
ReplyDelete** "Romania" = 118 ro
** "Thirty-Three Thousand Year" = 118 red
"Thirty-Three Thousand" = 96 red ... However, there were --
"No Bones" = 33 rr ... just a --
"Skull And No Bones" = 227 ro, *83 rr ... supposedly proving --
"Homicide Is Human" = *83 red
Which is what this "study" claims, specifically citing --
"Violent Interpersonal Behaviour And Murder" = 222 rr
As a naturally-occurring human trait.
"Research" = 77 eo, * 41 red
"Skull And Bones" = * 41 red
"Science" = * 41 rr
This propaganda piece is out to convince readers that humans are naturally violent towards each other -- & always have been. And this assertion is based solely upon a single skull (of dubious age & origin), & their pseudo-CSI "research" that posits a scenario which NO ONE could possibly know For A Fact.
The conclusions drawn are 100% supposition -- (& the entire story is likely to be 100% fiction) -- which reveals this bogus "discovery" to be yet another Behavioral Engineering Tool.
Clearly the "goal" is to cement the belief into people's minds that ALL ("common") humans have a natural propensity for violence -- that it's part of our DNA & the "proof" is as old as time.
This is meant to encourage future support for Pre-Crime tactics & the equally fraudulent Theoretical claim that Violence Is In Our DNA.
"Theoretical" = 116 eo ... mirror of 911
Don't even get me started on the implications of how a "Skull And NO Bones" (supposedly from "common" man's "ancestor") relates to "Skull AND Bones" ... a group who blatantly purports to be Superior to All Other Humans ... despite having hypocritically proven themselves (in Fact), to be among the Most Bloodthirsty & Murderous "humans" that ever existed.
And note the Supreme Irony of "research" claiming to have solved a "murder" from 33,000 years ago ... while every day we're presented with reports about sudden, "inexplicable" celebrity deaths -- unsolvable & mysterious (until the familiar causes of "drugs" or "cancer" are trotted out ...). Though sometimes they don't even bother to do that.
But, we're supposed to believe this (fictional) ancient homicide scenario -- without question -- because it's being presented by "Scientific Experts", who conveniently provide both the imagery & narrative for us ... in order to squelch the TRUE & ACTUAL NATURE OF HUMANS -- which is to BE SKEPTICAL. :D ;D
right on!!
Delete