Dedicated to exposing "the cabal" those who govern from the shadows, the invisible empire, operating by the numbers, on the daily.
Saturday, November 28, 2015
16 17 33 44 | 1971-72 Lakers 33 Game Winning Streak, In Light of Warriors and 76ers Winning & Losing Streaks
44 will be central in what is written in the following breakdown of the current Warriors winning streak. Notice Jerry West is shown wearing #44, a member of the 33-win streak Lakers.
Jerry = 1+5+9+9+7 = 31
West = 5+5+1+2 = 13
Jerry West = 44
Notice the Warriors set the win streak record to start the season, 16-0, against the Lakers, who had a 33-game winning streak, in the season the Warriors became the Golden State Warriors, 44-years ago. In 2015, they defeated the Cavs in the NBA Finals, who were in their 44th-year of existence.
King James = 44 (LeBron James nickname, who returned to Cleveland for their 44th season)
44 has been a very important number in pro sports in recent history, as I have documented on this blog.
Sixteen = 1+9+6+2+5+5+5 = 33
It is no coincidence the Golden State Warriors are 17-0 and the Philadelphia 76ers are 0-17. Remember, the Warriors began their franchise history in Philadelphia, where they went to the NBA Championship in the first season of the league, losing to the Minnesota Lakers.
Also, the 76ers became 0-17 exactly 76-days after Moses Malone died, who died 17-days after Daryl Dawkins.
In the offseason, Darryl Dawkins died on August 27 and Moses Malone died on September 13, 17-days apart. We'll see what happens for both of these teams in their 18th game.
http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2015/08/44-58-239-darryl-dawkins-of.html
http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2015/09/44-59-71-89-death-of-moses-malone.html
The Warriors play the Kings tonight.
Kings = 2+9+5+7+1 = 24/33
The 76ers play at the Grizzlies tomorrow.
Grizzlies = 7+9+9+8+8+3+9+5+1 = 59/68
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A lot of people are talking about the Utah jazz ending their streak but I do not think that is the case tonight. I say game ends in sum of 221 points
ReplyDeleteWhoa how the hell did you know ?
DeleteIt really ended in a sum of 221 points please reply. That would be in fucking credible
DeleteIt did amazing I would have betted if I were of age
DeleteGreat call! How did you come up with 221?
DeleteKings are leading 5-0 uh oh
ReplyDeleteI was trying to look for patterns between SB winning teams over the past few years.
ReplyDeleteI was looking at the Gematria of players that winning teams acquired.
In 2014, NE signed Patrick Chung from Eagles.
Patrick Chung has 131 Gematria (like Superbowl)
In 2013, Seattle signed Michael Bennett from TB.
Michael Bennett has 131 Gematria also.
In 2012, Baltimore Ravens signed Sean Considine from AZ.
Sean Considine also has 131 Gematria.
Can't find much info on players that NYG picked up
Anyone have any info?
I like this thought. I'll look into it!
DeleteI keep on seeing a lot of 7-4 and 4-7 records in the nfl and if the falcons win tomorrow their record will be 7-4 and minny will drop to 7-4.
DeleteIt us interesting to note that the Warriors play Lebron's Cavaliers on Christmas day. A win there would bring the Warriors record to 29-0 and extend their win streak to 33 games over two seasons
ReplyDeleteLOL yeaah we talk some 33/ we also talk some 44. Maybe a little 59. Whatever the Z's want, you know?
ReplyDeleteGS I figured you'd be my man...lol
ReplyDeleteRoddy White = 131
ReplyDeleteHe's not a trade acquisition obviously, but a big deal has been made about his absence in the offense this year. The Colts game opened with 3 straight passes to him and a predictable 3 and out. Fans seriously think Ryan and White hate each other. I mean LOOOL. They are now booing Ryan when he throws a bad pass, and chanting Roddy's name when he catches anything.
I'll look at Denver and the previous champs soon. I just remembered Roddy White was 131 and didn't make the connection before.
Also, it might be not so much trading for players, but simply having a 131 on your team at the time. Hence why those trades may have been done. Just a thought, we'll see.
DeleteI was, looking at Chris Conley too at Kansas city.
ReplyDeleteHe's 131 too.
I'm wondering if maybe its their birth date too or the place they were born.
Maybe this isn't the link either though.
I think it might be in the coach movement also. Keep an eye on the new coaches for those teams, if there are any.
ReplyDeleteI know it's rigged, but wow that 2011 Giants team with a Pythag record of 7.9-8.1 was a very bad team. Haha. I was so pissed when the Falcons lost 24-2 to them. Now it's just funny to me.
But then again, remember the 2008 NFC title game?
Delete9-6-1 Philly at 9-7 Arizona. Weird shit.
I went through the winners draft picks too from their previous draft but couldn't find any connections.
ReplyDeleteYeah, it was weird. Belichick has been around forever so I don't think it's the coach.
ReplyDeleteIt still might be the 131 but with another connection like birth date or place of birth.
it's interesting also that Bellichick was the Giants D Coordinator for the 2 Parcells' SBs. Somehow it makes sense that he would lost to them 2 times in the SB later.
DeleteThat is interesting.
DeleteIf we could get some help from other people to go through the Gematria of the teams in NFL we could see how many are 131 or maybe other patterns.
ReplyDeleteIts a lot of work though.
Its clear they use Gematria in their scoring, its gotta be the key to everything.
Yeah, it's like you'll find a pattern that works for a lot of instances but it's never every instance. The theory on rotating patterns or really rotating the tells of the winners makes sense to me, but the frequency of each pattern's use is another pattern in itself. Haha. So idk, but we're definitely on the track.
DeleteYup, we need a forum and some help.
DeleteI know u were wondering how a team repeats and how would we know etc... The 131 would be a way of knowing, that's if its correct.
ReplyDeleteBTW.. Chris Conley was just drafted this year. So he wasn't traded. Its very interesting that he was born in Turkey though. Also Patrick Chung was born in Jamaica!!
ReplyDeleteAnother comnectoo to all three, Considine, Bennett and Chung is that they all play Defense. That,may be another tell.
ReplyDeleteI think if we get 5 guys to pick a team from the last 5 superbowls and get the Gematria of the entire roster.
ReplyDeleteCompare them with each other, I think we may get some comparisons.
Maybe its not 131, it may be another number.
I cannot find a 131 on Giants roster.
I like that idea a lot.
DeleteYou're right on about it being different numbers too. I think we can find the common numbers in every SB team that seem to show up.
If I'm right about the Falcons, that will show me a lot because I saw the numbers from the get-go. But today's game will tell the tale. Lose that and I'll start looking at other teams more closely. Watch Bridgewater go off. I think Shaun Hill (backup QB with SF connections) may appear in this game. Either a blowout or injury perhaps. Could be wrong.
Yeah, you definitely are on to something with the Falcons. I like your thinking.
DeleteHope you're right.
wow great article, I wonder how the NBA is going to do this for lebron james , have warriors lose to the cavs on christmas day?
ReplyDeleteI was also looking at using Gematria for the actual SB.
ReplyDeleteFor example, last year's was Superbowl LXIX.
If ya type in the roman numerals too and try and match up players Gematria.
They changed it this year to no Roman numerals, just Superbowl 50.
I wonder if this has any significance?
Maybe offensive and defensive coordinator or just other minor coaches in general? Those tend to change quite a bit, and maybe the stadium that they play in for they super bowl has something to do with it too, I'll try to find connections. You think we could find the formula they use to rig regular season games? It'd be so easy to show people how rigged sports are if we found this, I think baseball would be easier because the only thing that changes between a series is starting pitcher and date, again on the formula for football, maybe each team has their own?
ReplyDelete