Dedicated to exposing "the cabal" those who govern from the shadows, the invisible empire, operating by the numbers, on the daily.
Saturday, January 2, 2016
33 122 | Robert Lawler Wins In Controversial Decision
http://www.sbnation.com/2016/1/3/10702734/ufc-195-fight-results-lawler-condit
Fans are saying the decision was very controversial, as Condit landed 84 more strikes than Lawler.
Recall, this fight came 78-days before Robert's birthday.
Robert = 18+15+2+5+18+20 = 78
Robert = 9+6+2+5+9+2 = 33 (MGM = 13+7+13 = 33)
The last time there was a controversial decision at the end of a big fight at the MGM, it was Pacquiao losing to Mayweather, on the 122nd day of the year. They call Robert Lawler, "Ruthless".
Ruthless = 18+21+20+8+12+5+19+19 = 122
https://twitter.com/MJCflipdascript?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Robbie Lawler = 732 (12)
ReplyDeleteRuthless = 732 (12)
1/2/2016 = 12
1+2+20+16 = 39
Robbie Lawler = 732
(look at that number in reverse.... 237. 2+37 = 39 just like the date)
This is what i seen before the fight which made me think he was going to win..... The other guy didn't really have any connections with the date.
The loser had the connection, it was his 39th fight on the date with 39 numerology.
DeleteYes but I'm talking about his gematria connection to the date....
DeleteI used to documented this pattern on athletes a lot.... even winners of contestants on tv shows..... their gematria usually correlates with the date they win 99% of the time.
at least from what i see.
You said, "Because he is currently 33-years old, Robbie Rawler might be ripe for a loss. This number often show up around sacrifice." Also supported it with "Because this is Condit's 39th fight, coming on the date with '39' numerology, and because he hasn't been fighting that much lately, it seems things are lined up for him to win, defeating the 33-year old."
ReplyDeleteIt's almost as if it's impossible for you to make a correct call. Don't get me wrong though...you are "Captain Hindsight" and should maybe stick with showing peculiar anomalies after the fact, then remind readers they should have bet one direction or another. Yes, past tense, because you are an epic failure proving future events with your current logic.
Regardless, it's amusing.
They mentioned during the fight that it would be lawlers "12th" fight... to go 5 rounds...
Delete1/2/2016 = 12
Lawler = 71 (26) [8]. In English Sumerian, Lawler = 426 [12].
ReplyDelete