https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHTsCaqDKA75OLAFHqFSU5w
The link above is to sub Matthew Nicholson's YouTube Channel.
I just got a really nasty message from Matthew, he is mad at me for some reason. I don't know what he is mad about, but it is very apparent he is mad and not happy with me. So, in return, what I want to do, is ask everyone to sub his channel that has not already. Why? Because I think Matthew Nicholson makes great videos and has very interesting methods that are eye opening. Also, I'm hoping that he'll see this post, and not be so mad at me. I feel bad that he is mad in the first place and I don't even know what for. Last time I checked, we both got along fine.
Anyhow, Matthew definitely deserves a bigger audience! His latest video on Waco is excellent! In terms of video creativity and editing, it is brilliant, and that isn't even counting the research.
He's got some fantastic insights on number reversal. There's so many layers to the numerology of the staged news events. I've gotten to where I sometimes calculate gematria of words in my dreams.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI haven't gotten to this dream stage yet, but I have been having this thing happen where I'll have a number come up for something during research, then a word or phrase will come to me and I'll run it through the calculator and it is the same as the number I had just been working on. And I mean like stuff that's not already in a database. I believe our brains are wired to subconsciously do this stuff. Like it's part of our lower level programming.
DeleteOur subconscious minds can do a lot more than we give it credit for.
DeleteI think you're right about lower level programming. It's like throwing a ball. When you throw a ball to a moving person, you don't make explicit calculations of speed, angle, weight of the ball, or dexterity of the person catching the ball. However, these things are calculated nonetheless. We use our conscious facilities (paper and pencil, calculators, etc) to confirm the conclusions of the subconscious.
Yes Edward, this is right. It is also like drumming, your body can make happen what your conscious mind cannot calculate.
DeleteYeah I've wondered if the gradual proliferation of electronic sequencers in music production has something to do with causing atrophy in our natural ability to play the instruments ourselves.
DeleteI remember when my father was still alive and I showed him something I had done in Fruity Loops (before it was FL Studio) and he basically bitched at me that it wasn't real musicianship, because I wasn't physically playing the instruments. I'll never forget that.
Ed, I'm going to be using that explanation from now. Really profound stuff, guys. Thanks.
Delete*from now on (fucking thing needs an edit button so bad.. or maybe I should just proof-read my comments before I spam) ;)
DeleteYou are right about this guy. Really amazing stuff. I hope we're all able to work together. Probably time for me to dust off my video editing tools and participate.
ReplyDeleteI think we can, even if it's not working directly together. One person sees one thing, another sees something else.
DeleteI love his work. He is who got me started doing "devil math" as I call it, adding or multiplying inversions, etc. Like most code breakers, he has the always present ego, which I personally don't mind but I can see how it might turn other people off. Plus, many rumor spreaders are spreading with the YT truth seekers, playing really good researchers against each other with rumor and subterfuge. Probably another, well he said you're a shill moment with no validation. The powers don't want us working together.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I'm interested to know what the message was about. I've only watched his video about the Branch Davidian blitz (which is really great stuff, btw) so I don't know what the guy thinks about the usual truther wedge issues.
DeleteGreat point about the ego bit. I have a theory that our disembodied internet 'comment and reply' relationships make our egos extra sensitive and inflated. We strain to detect if people are consciously lying and we have been well-trained to suspect deception and infiltration around every corner. However, we would probably be stupid to completely ditch such paranoia.
"Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean They are not out to get you."
If we could speak more like real life, I doubt there would be so much animosity.
Like the point Zach made yesterday(?) that in person, he feels that he is much nicer to those who aren't on board with all of this information. We're all more comfortable flying off the handle, so to speak, when it's online. It takes balls of a certain size to admit that we have these weaknesses. ;)
Delete