Thursday, July 3, 2014

33 | "Jon Sacker" Border Crossing Concerns via Lung Transplant Tale


It is reported that 33-year old Jon Sacker incurred more trouble with a border crossing than an actual lung transplant.  The story of Jon Sacker is also coded with master numerology through Gematria.  Let us begin, starting with the name Jon Sacker.
  • Jon Sacker = 1+6+5+1+1+3+2+5+9 = 33
  • Jon Sacker = 1+6+5+1+1+3+11+5+9 = 42
The prior reduction was with the Pythagorean Method, the next is the Simple Method.
  • Jon = 10+15+14 = 39
  • Sacker = 19+1+3+11+5+18 = 57
  • Jon Sacker = 96
The article by Toronto's paper points out that it seems odd the United States would give someone so much trouble about bringing a product which is made in the United States back into their own country.  In the case of 'Hemolung', which Jon Sacker was carrying for the operation, it became a point of contention and he was not allowed to cross into the United States with the lung product in his possession.

In turn, the CEO of Hemolung called his trusted distrubtor 'Murray Beaton' who met Jon Sacker on the U.S. side of the border, and gave him another lung for the procedure.  In other words, it was "33 to the rescue".
  • Murray = 4+3+9+9+1+7 = 33
Are you getting what a load this story is?  That's what they feed us- loads, steaming loads.  Credit to fakeologist.com

2 comments:

  1. The only story that qualifies for "what a load" is this post. You should search the facts before you post something as absurd and stupid as this. Do you know whether Jon Sacker was fetching the device or whether he was the hospitalized patient in dire need of is? Do you know who, if not Jon Sacker, fetched the device? Can you Google on "Jon Sacker hemolung" and perhaps find out that you severely are lacking in (1) comprehensions skills, (2) reading skills, (3) retention skills, (4) truth-telling capabilities, (5) or all of the above and more. Perhaps you should give up math, reading, posting, and start over again in elementary school education. Somewhere you completely missed connecting with reality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Have you read my blog before? I am documenting an ongoing pattern in mainstream media reporting that seems to go far beyond coincidence. The story behind the fiction of 'Jon Sacker' is not of much concern to me. If you take the time to read more of my blog, I think you will answer all of the assumptions you have posed. Thank you.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.