Thursday, December 31, 2015

88 | I'm pretty sure Eric Dubay is a fraud

When I listen to the voice of Eric Dubay, it sounds hollow, a man without any emotion or passion.  There is also something interesting about his name in gematria, which could be a coincidence... or not.

Eric = 5+18+9+3 = 35
Dubay = 4+21+2+1+25 = 53
Eric Dubay = 88

 Poison = 16+15+9+19+15+14 = 88
Program = 16+18+15+7+18+1+13 = 88

 To see the poisoning and programming, look at the legions of sheeple who went full board for the flat earth theory in very mad ways since this past summer.  There are several people who used to help me in this research who now mock me because I refuse to state that the earth is flat...

What's funny is how none of these people can explain the sunrise or sunset on the flat earth.  The sunrise and sunset is essentially definitive proof that the earth is not flat.

The one thing I do like about the flat earth theory though, that I must state, is that it shows people are questioning.  Questioning is great, arriving at false conclusions is not.
Posted by at

66 comments:

  1. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 8:44 AM

    I'd have to agree with you on this one, the behavior of some of the Flat-Earthers is strange and feverish. It's like a mania has swept over the truth movement, to give them a token issue to be upset about.

    That being said, I know NASA is lying to us about something.

    Could there be an entire continent, they're hiding behind the thick ice wall that is Antarctica? Is there a secret paradise, a playground of sorts, for the elites and chosen few sell-outs? I certainly wouldn't doubt it one bit. Who knows, maybe this is where a select group of the actors go, when they're finished playing their roles.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 10:04 AM

      I agree very much, this is what I have speculated about since I started this blog, even before the "flat earth fever" began. NASA is no doubt lying and falsifying their evidence, but that doesn't mean by default the earth is flat. It could be many different alternatives.

      Delete
  2. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 8:48 AM

    I suggest everyone read the book, 'Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds', written by Charles Mackay.

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownDecember 31, 2015 at 8:54 AM

    You are right about Dubay, he doesn't have any sort of passion behind what he does. Ultimately, does it matter what shape the World is? I don't think so. We all know NASA lies about 90% of the time, and none of us will be invited to take place in Space Adventures anytime soon, so the whole theory was designed as a conflict with no resolution purposely with the intent to divide truth seekers. I am much more concerned with the state of what is on the World, not the shape.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BallygobackwardsDecember 31, 2015 at 9:31 AM

      I agree Stephen.. Who cares?
      We have more important stuff ta worry about.

      Delete
    2. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 10:05 AM

      Exactly, 100% correct. This is what I have pointed out to those who have been swept away with the flat earth theory, but they don't seem to be able to see the forest for the trees.

      Delete
  4. AnonymousDecember 31, 2015 at 9:14 AM

    I would argue that Dubay is controlled opposition, but occultic numbers do appear in all the numbers they give us about space.
    Sun is 93 million miles away and 330000 times the mass of earth.
    Moons diameter is 2106 mi.
    Earth has a tilt of 66.6 degrees, travels around the sun at 66600 miles, and has a curvature of 66.6 feet over 10 miles.
    So I think there is something to the flat earth theory, but Dubay is definitely a shill.

    To awnser your question about sunrise and sunset, it supposedly the sun traveling into the horizon, and leaving the horizon. It's not rising or setting in the horizon, the sun and its light are disappearing into the horizons vanishing point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 9:25 AM

      That's a weak argument about the sun. The sun doesn't shrink in size as it sets. If it was disappearing into the horizon, it would appear to shrink; similar to when looking down a long stretch of highway.

      Delete
    2. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 9:33 AM

      As for the occult numbers, that doesn't prove that the Earth is flat. It just mean they're lying about something, and fudging the numbers to fit their code; like they always do.

      Delete
    3. AnonymousDecember 31, 2015 at 9:44 AM

      If you want to use visual perception to discredit this theory on the motion of the sun, then you have to use it to discredit a round earth. We see the horizon is flat, whether your at sea level or on a plane. In traveling by boat, we see that the ocean is flat, we don't see a hill of water that would be necessary on a round earth.

      Delete
    4. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 10:07 AM

      Yea, that argument about the sunset is so weak it is beyond laughable. Please don't repeat it again. The sun is clearly not at its furthest point in the sky when it rises and sets behind the horizon.

      Delete
    5. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 10:08 AM

      Actually, when a ship on the sea first appears on the horizon, you can see the top of the ship before you can see it's lower body. This suggests the earth is round, not flat.

      Delete
    6. AnonymousDecember 31, 2015 at 10:28 AM

      @ Zachary, air density bends the light of the ship downward, that's why you only see the tops of ships at great distances. Point is, you shouldn't be able to see these ships at all if the curvature is 8 ^2 inches per mile. When a ship first apears at the horizon, it's way more than 10 miles (66.6 feet of curvature) from the observer. That would mean that these ships appearing in the horizon would all have to be over 80 feet tall, assuming that they first appear at 10 miles.

      Delete
    7. UnknownDecember 31, 2015 at 10:30 AM

      BOOM! Owned by a Flat Earther Seektofind you're a fool and I mean in the comments you sent to me. That's all you do is contradict yourself and make baseless assumptions. Lets not forget the people who made the heliocentric theroy are sunworship Satan Worshipping freemasons I'll take Flat Earth instead of a theroy created by Satanic Men. You can say the Bible was created by men like Zach has while he threw up that *666* sign but Sodom and Gomorrah with then highest concentrated Brimstone/Sulfur known to man spread ALL over the Ruins of the city. Only theory these fools came up with was a Volcano which isn't possible.


      The Elite know the God of the Bible exists especially when they took the Book of Enoch out of the Bible which shows their destruction/ Punishment.

      Also it states in the Bible that the non believers are fools which seems valid on here since you are buying information from freemasons which means you're contradicting yourselves!

      Also as for the Sunrise and Sunset it's been debunked you can go see How NASA shows a sunset compared to time-lapse footage which debunks it. The information is out there but when you don't want to find the truth"Truth-seeker" you wont find it.

      Just so much hypocrisy.

      GO make your videos debunking the theory like RussianVids told you to. All we get from you is nothing because you know you will get squashed.

      Trying to basically have a debate with you and you don't respond and call him a stupid Christian fool ON YOUR BLOG. You know what that sounds like?

      Lol you talk so much but can't debunk it

      Delete
    8. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 10:50 AM

      There's no reason to debunk something that hasn't been proven yet. How about you prove it first? Essentially, you're just using his blog to spout your own personal ideology.

      You're an RV fan-boy haha; That tells me all I need to know, about your agenda in commenting here. You think he's dis-info because he doesn't beLIEve in what you do; Seriously, grow up. You're just as bad as all the other sheeple; Arguably, even worse. You're nothing but a free-range sheeple, who thinks he escaped the slaughterhouse. Now go take you infantile nonsense somewhere else; You're not fooling anyone.

      Delete
    9. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 10:55 AM

      Unknown, do you believe what you're writing? If the earth is truly round, it would be very logical why you would see the top of the ship before the base of it, as it emerges on the horizon. It wouldn't have anything to do with air density and its impacts on light. I don't follow your argument about why it would be impossible to see, that doesn't compute.

      And lupe, just get lost. I don't know why you hang around here. You come across as a young child who does nothing but make foolish arguments. You think it is amazing that someone predicted the #1 seed from the AFC and NFC would be in the Super Bowl... which shows how little you know and how weak your mind is at making arguments.

      Here is something simple to understand.

      With the flat earth theory, all you can do is prove that we have been lied to, and kept in the dark.

      With gematria, which is a much more important subject, we can prove that we have been lied to and kept in the dark, and we can also decode history as well as make projections about the future seeing as how history very much appears to have been waged by these numerological codes. The flat earth theory can't help take apart the most important lies of our lifetime, such as September 11, but gematria and numerology study can, as I show routinely.

      Move along sheep, or, if you're smart enough, wise up, stick around, and stop being a bitch.

      Delete
    10. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 1:12 PM

      Why didn't I predict the #1 seeds? Because it wasn't interesting, but I did predict why the Patriots would win once the game was set. After Week 3 I predicted the Colts would win the Super Bowl because of what happened that week with the Colts and Ravens getting the 44 tributes on the date with 44 numerology when the Baltimore Colts had won the Super Bowl 44 years prior. By the time the Super Bowl rolled around, the Patriots had advanced over the Ravens and Colts in the playoffs and the Super Bowl ended up being centered around 44 and 144 as I had written about all season, except it went to the Pats who were in the 44th year of being in their division. So through my prediction, even though it was not entirely correct, more was revealed about how the NFL is scripted than by those who predicted the #1 seeds would be in the Super Bowl. Can you see that?

      Delete
    11. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 1:15 PM

      And again this year, there were two 44 tributes for only two teams on the date with 44 numerology, the Packers and Falcons, which might prove to be a tribute for the Broncos this year, as those are the only two teams the Broncos have defeated in Super Bowls. And no, I am not Jewish, but my dads father who he does not know likely is. For whatever reason, I look a lot more Jewish than my father.

      Delete
    12. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 1:22 PM

      Minion? That's laughable. If not allowing someone, to stand by themselves when being attacked makes me a minion, then so be it.

      You on the other hand, prefer to contribute to the weak mentality, of attacking people in groups like a pack of dogs.

      I've actually disagreed with Zach several times, and those comments are still on this blog to this day; Minions don't ever disagree on anything. You might want to get your facts straight before spouting off at the mouth, but I know you won't bother. You'd rather just sling shit at people from a distance, hoping that something will eventually stick.

      Lastly, in one of your responses to me in a prior post, you stated several times, that I was riding his dick. You might want to reconsider, why that homoerotic response, might be programmed into your vernacular. The homosexual agenda is real ya'll.

      Feel free to respond to me if you wish, but I refuse to engage in discourse with a fool any longer.

      Delete
  5. AnonymousDecember 31, 2015 at 10:51 AM

    @ Zachary

    Simple math tells you the earth isn't millions of miles away. If your as smart and antimasonic as you claim you are, you would know that there's no way the earth is round and the sun is millions of miles away. High noon on the west coast puts the sun at a 90 angle, making it 3 pm on the east coast and putting sun on the east coast at roughtly 45 degrees(give or take some degrees). Knowing that the distance between both coasts is around 3000 miles, one can you Pythagorean theorem to determine that the sun is not millions of miles away. The angle between the sun and both coasts should be the same as the angle formed on the east coast, and a^2 +b^2 should equal c^2, which both don't.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 10:58 AM

      For more than two years I have pointed out that we have likely been lied to about how far away the sun is, and I have showed the significance of the measurement of 93 million miles and a whole lot more. I was writing about all of these things before the flat earth theory took over YouTube and the trolls of this blog. I don't know why you and other people keep making these arguments against me. You obviously don't know the history of my work.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousDecember 31, 2015 at 11:30 AM

      Ad hominem.

      Delete
    3. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 12:09 PM

      Straw man.

      Delete
    4. UnknownDecember 31, 2015 at 12:16 PM

      Every time you show the lies and the proof.. The harder it is for the retarded to wake up...

      Delete
  6. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 11:02 AM

    And please stop crediting the spherical earth to the Masons and NASA, this is not accurate. The spherical earth traces back to at least the Greeks. It would be easier to argue that the flat earth theory is a product of the masons, who have given the flat earth logo to their international governing body, the United Nations. Let us not forget how many spaces are made on that flat earth map either, '33'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 11:09 AM

      Boom!

      Delete
    2. AnonymousDecember 31, 2015 at 11:19 AM

      Do you believe what you are writing? You say that we see with our eyes the ship coming over the curvature of the horizon. Do you know how eyes work? We visually perceive an object when it's light waves passes through our retinas. Everything gives off light, that's how we are able to see. Now, considering that we don't live in a vacuum and atmospheric pressure exists, that light from the ship miles away is going to be distorted and refracted downward. Take a physics class.


      Aside from the fact the acient Greek you speak about, pythagreas and Copernicus, were widely considered to be Freemasons and are always depicted with a Masonic compass.

      Delete
    3. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 11:36 AM

      Scientific men possessing a square or compass is completely irrelevant. Those are tools needed to perform certain tasks. The Freemasons use them in their logo, but they don't hold sole ownership over them.

      Another thing to consider is that Freemasons rewrote our entire history as we know it. I would gather the depictions they filter out to the public aren't completely accurate; They're depictions, not actual pictures.

      Delete
    4. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 11:45 AM

      Also you may want to consider, who taught you these physics that you hold so dearly to your heart? Who runs these universities, and academia in general? Is every single aspect of physics 100% provable fact, or is there any room left open for interpretation or theory?

      Delete
    5. AnonymousDecember 31, 2015 at 12:01 PM

      Many aspects of physics are a provable fact, don't know if all are. I mean, some of these things are common sense. It doesn't take some advanced degree to figure these thing out. Take a laser and point it through water or fog, it's light will refract. There no point in arguing with you if can't grasp that.

      Delete
    6. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 12:06 PM

      Stand on one side of a hill and have a friend stand on the other. Ask your friend to walk to the top of the hill. Notice how your friends head enters your line of sight before his feet do. Is this because air density bends light?

      Delete
    7. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 12:06 PM

      We can build scientific replica models for study, but there are certain aspects of human anatomy that cannot be completely duplicated as of yet. If we could duplicate human eyes, we would already be cloning them. How's that for common sense?

      Delete
    8. AnonymousDecember 31, 2015 at 1:52 PM

      @ Zachary your comparing two completely different circumstances. My example is over several miles, yours I presume is over only a couple. Water is always going to find a leveled surface, there's no arguing that. I agree that it's pretty absurd to think your a shill, even thought your wrong about the earth. I do think your extremely stubborn and stuck in your ways.

      @seek is just a troll, and hasn't said anything of value

      Delete
    9. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 1:57 PM

      Unknown, excellent job of presenting an argumentum ad hominem! Amazing, I am truly floored!

      Delete
  7. David EsktorpDecember 31, 2015 at 11:40 AM

    Nowadays, everyone is a fraud/shill/troll according to someone else. You know it's very possible that this 'truth movement' (which is a stupid concept and term to begin with) is a mixture of paid shills and normal people who have been turned in to paranoid egomaniacs. It's not really a surprise. This is cult of personality bullshit and it is not productive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. David EsktorpDecember 31, 2015 at 11:44 AM

      The usual suspects in the flat earth circles spend more time accusing other people of being shills and they do talking about the shape of the earth. This is probably the biggest red flag for the entire topic. The idea that everyone you meet is some sort of controlled opposition is actually way more ridiculous than the idea of the earth being flat, or shaped like a dick and balls.

      Delete
    2. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 11:49 AM

      I'd like to see them put together a crowd funding effort, so they can go up into space and prove it; I would even contribute personally. Anything else is just completely speculative and counterproductive to their movement, in my opinion.

      Delete
    3. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 12:10 PM

      David, if you go on YouTube, you will notice there are more videos made about me being a shill than anyone else. It is actually quite amazing for as small of a following as I have and for as short of a period of time that I have been around. The majority of the channels promoting this message are on board with the flat earth theory. I'm just trying to set the record straight. I have never made a video addressing my critics or calling anyone a shill.

      Delete
    4. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 12:18 PM

      If you I search your name on YouTube, the top promoted videos are the ones trying to discredit you. One of them is even by some loser, that sleeps on the couch in his parents basement. One should ask, why is some random loser with no subs or following, being promoted to one of the top search results? It's rather suspicious if you ask me.

      Delete
    5. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 12:24 PM

      (If you search*) Damn typos

      Delete
    6. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 12:42 PM

      What is frustrating is that if I search my name and any topic I am looking for, the majority of the shill videos show up above it every single time, and as you stated, many of these channels have no subs and no following. I wish the first shill video made about me still existed, it was the best, made after I had pointed out that the government wasn't coming for anyone's guns, but was definitely interested in scaring people into buying more guns and ammunition.

      Delete
  8. UnknownDecember 31, 2015 at 12:18 PM

    Time for your fluoride ball earthers .... Pink or green...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 12:22 PM

      Fluoride? Get real, that's so 1999.

      Delete
    2. UnknownDecember 31, 2015 at 12:35 PM

      This entire thread just shows the real purpose of the whole Earth Shape Debate. Its a waste of time. People get so offended because they are so sure they know the shape of the planet. Ask yourself why you care? What does it matter? Whether the Earth is flat or round once the FEMA camps are done with you and they stack you in a biodegradable coffin that fits 15 bodies, you will be buried IN the Earth. So, unless you think your forced slave existence is less important then the shape of the Earth, you should shut the fuck up and find something worth researching.

      Delete
    3. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 12:39 PM

      Thank you Stephen, I agree. These are the points I have been making for many months. Bartley is one of the people who used to contribute positively here. Daniel Pratt is another. Same with StinkyCash and more. They all jumped ship for the flat earth theory, telling me if I didn't come along they didn't want anything to do with me. It was amazing to me how these people could not see the dead end of the flat earth theory. Adding insult to injury, they all started mocking my research.

      Delete
    4. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 12:47 PM

      Stephen, I agree with everything you've stated in it's entirety.

      With that being said; When someone is alone being surrounded by potential enemies, cowards will either sit and watch, or walk away. I'm not going to stand by and allow Zach to be attacked by himself. My father taught me better than that. If people view me as a bad person because of my decision to stand by his side, then so be it.

      Delete
    5. UnknownDecember 31, 2015 at 1:37 PM

      Simply put; people are lazy. They want someone to show them everything with a single click of a button. That is why I follow you, Zach. Though your research does not always fit your earlier predictions every time, it does hit the mark very often or atleast reveals its coding in hindsight, like the Pats last year. Error is the part of research that garners the most learning. The same mistakes are very seldom made again. The reason you get trolled almost religiously is because you are on top of perhaps the most used coding from the elites. If a truth seeker is willing to go against you because they don't like one thing you've said then they are close minded and destined to never truly wake up. We can hope one day they do, but it isn't worth our time to bring them back. An open mind opens that third eye which opens the truth.

      Delete
    6. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 1:52 PM

      Good points, Stephen.

      Anyone that expects all the truth contained in the universe, from only one source, is either intellectually lazy, or just plain stupid. You'd have much better luck, trying to track down the ever-illusive unicorn.

      Delete
    7. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 1:53 PM

      ever-elusive*

      Delete
  9. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 12:21 PM

    Why are you still here dude? You've been calling Zach a shill for the longest time. I don't know about everyone else, but when I don't buy what someone is selling, I just walk away.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Zachary K. HubbardDecember 31, 2015 at 12:23 PM

    Your argument is not sound. I do not claim to know the shape of the earth, but if it is a sphere, it doesn't mean that the math NASA and mainstream science promotes is true. This is not a black and white issue. And for someone who said they were done with me months ago, you sure do show your head a lot. Why are you so active in keeping up with my work Bartley?

    ReplyDelete
  11. *<{13}$~@{27}#~#{8}@~${39}>*December 31, 2015 at 12:26 PM

    Not intelligible..... Does not compute....

    ReplyDelete
  12. UnknownDecember 31, 2015 at 1:08 PM

    Flat Earth Debate dividing? Please this is how it is dealing with the Close minded saying Flat Earth was created by Freemasons of course you're not going to get anywhere with that. Do the research on all the PEOPLE who gave the Heliocentric theory light. A complete fraud

    ReplyDelete
  13. SkullianJanuary 1, 2016 at 4:07 AM

    Wow...people care about the shape because if its not a ball then its the ultimate deception.

    Also Zack I cant believe you are using the ship over the horizon arguement. It has been debunked. The ships reappear when you zoom in, proving it was your eyes limits not something dropping over a curve.

    But yes Dubay is schetchy as fuck..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Zachary K. HubbardJanuary 1, 2016 at 9:44 AM

      The ship over the horizon is valid argument I think. And like I said in the original post, we've been deceived about a lot more important things than the shape of the earth. The shape of the earth is relatively unimportant in regards to all that we have been lied about.

      Delete
  14. mikehJanuary 1, 2016 at 9:03 AM

    Look at the Concave Earth Theory. It explains a lot of things that the flat earth theory does not. Check out wildheretic.com and Lord Steven Christ on youtube. The info Lord Steven Christ has is excellent, if you can get past his personal views.

    ReplyDelete
  15. torusMay 30, 2016 at 9:18 AM

    Dubay takes the credulity of his audience for granted. In his youtube video "The Earth Is Not A Planet", he states, "using a telescope you can see that the things they call stars look exactly like the things they call planets." I've used a telescope to confirm just the opposite, and I did it before Dubay was even born. Using star/ plane maps as provided by "them", The Royal Astronomical Society, I tracked Jupiter and Saturn. They look nothing like stars. I'm curious as to why Dubay spouts such utter nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  16. torusMay 30, 2016 at 9:29 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  17. UnknownJuly 21, 2016 at 1:10 PM

    The sun very much shrinks as it goes to the horizon and it all depends on how much perspective you have from your vantage point. Look at time lapse videos on YouTube. The sun is local.

    ReplyDelete
  18. UnknownJanuary 17, 2017 at 10:55 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  19. UnknownJanuary 17, 2017 at 11:21 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. UnknownJanuary 17, 2017 at 11:29 AM

    Eric Dubay is a fraud because he is knowledgeable flat earther that is also a successful Freemason controlled opposition agent to discredit flat earth. He has a wacko homosexual act video flashing Freemason signs one after the other, and has put out some flat earth untruths that have been debunked therefore attacking flat earth.

    ReplyDelete
  21. UnknownJanuary 17, 2017 at 5:19 PM

    That is true that the NASA hoax does not mean there is flat earth, but it would support flat earth because since they faked NASA it would be natural to fake globe earth.

    ReplyDelete
  22. UnknownJanuary 17, 2017 at 5:49 PM


    Flat earth is not such a recent phenomenon as you think because there are strong indications of flat earth secretly being revealed in music videos, and in a movie of the late 1980's and 90's, let alone the ancients thought the earth to be flat. This is shown in R.E.M.'s music video "Stand," and "Losing My Religion" and possibly in other R.E.M. music. As an aside R.E.M. back then also did a NASA moon landing hoax music video called "Man on the Moon." The movie "Man on the Moon" seems to be about revealing flat earth, but is kind hard to be sure about. The author Tracy R. Twyman has done an excellent job of impartially breaking this down on the web. Movies and music tell the news and the news tells the lies. This is the freemason duality principle which to keep secrets, but they must also reveal them which they do in movies and music.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)