Tuesday, January 26, 2016

17 23 33 44 137 139 | Tila Tequila 'Flat Earth' and 'conspiracy' tweets from January 6-7, 2016


The date of this news stands out.

1/7/2016 = 1+7+20+6 = 44 (Space = 19+16+1+3+5 = 44)
1/7/2016 = 1+7+2+0+1+6 = 17 (Space = 1+7+1+3+5 = 17)

Notice how the gematria of 'space' corresponds with the date.  The argument of flat earth, is very much an argument of space, and what the existence of our reality is.

Tila = 2+9+3+1 = 15
Tequila = 2+5+8+3+9+3+1 = 31
Tila Tequila = 46

Tila = 20+9+12+1 = 42
Tequila = 20+5+17+21+9+12+1 = 85
Tila Tequila = 127




Thien = 2+8+9+5+5 = 29
Thanh = 2+8+1+5+8 = 24
Thi = 2+8+9 = 19
Nguyen = 5+7+3+7+5+5 = 32
Thien Thanh Thi Tnguyen = 104

Thien = 20+8+9+5+14 = 56
Thanh = 20+8+1+14+8 = 51
Thi = 20+8+9 = 37
Nguyen = 14+7+21+25+5+14 = 86
Thien Thanh Thi Tnguyen = 230



10/24/1981 = 10+24+19+81 = 134
10/24/1981 = 10+24+(1+9+8+1) = 53 (Religion = 9+5+3+9+7+9+6+5 = 53)
10/24/1981 = 1+0+2+4+1+9+8+1 = 26
10/24/81 = 10+24+81 = 115

The flat earth debate is very much a religious debate, bringing out the worst of religious extremism.

Below are her tweets, they begin on January 6 and run through January 7.  Notice the time stamps, some really stand out.












That tweet at 10:39 about 23 and 33 is interesting.  Freemasonry = 139.  Also, her January 6-7 tweet series began on a date with '23' numerology.

1/6/16 = 1+6+16 = 23

That's the thing about twitter, anyone can be anyone.

http://observer.com/2016/01/tila-tequila-truly-believes-the-earth-is-flat-and-wont-stop-yelling-about-it-on-twitter/

4 comments:

  1. Interestingly enough, at the time she was making these tweets, she was following 93 people and had 33k followers, i took a screen shot of it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. She nearly died a few yrs ago and said the illuminati are trying to kill her.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rapper Bob is doing the same

    ReplyDelete
  4. I guess the flat earth has just gone mainstream. This is how they do it, by mockery. Zach, I think I remember you saying something about how you never believed the sun was 93 million miles away, that it's much closer. That in itself destroys the physics of the ball model. I see you disparage the "flat earth movement" a lot, but I don't think I've ever seen you present an alternate model, or do you believe heliocentricity is the one thing we were told the truth about?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.