Notice the fight is at the MGM Grand Garden Arena.
MGM = 13+7+13 = 33 (A 33-year old vs CC, 33)
Grand = 7+18+1+14+4 = 44
Garden = 7+1+18+4+5+14 = 49
Arena = 1+18+5+14+1 = 39
MGM Grand = 77 (Natural Born Killer)
MGM Grand Garden Arena = 165
MGM = 4+7+4 = 15
Grand = 7+9+1+5+4 = 26
Garden = 7+1+9+4+5+5 = 31
Arena = 1+9+5+5+1 = 21
MGM Grand = 41
MGM Grand Garden Arena = 93 (39th Fight for Condit, "Natural Born Killer")
The date of the fight is January 2, 2016.
1/2/2016 = 1+2+20+16 = 39 (Carlos Condit's 39th fight today)
1/2/2016 = 1+2+2+0+1+6 = 12
1/2/16 = 1+2+16 = 19
1/2 = 1+2 = 3
Robert = 9+6+2+5+9+2 = 33 (Robbie = 9+6+2+2+9+5 = 33)
Glenn = 7+3+5+5+5 = 25
Lawler = 3+1+5+3+5+9 = 26
Robert Glenn Lawler = 84
Robbie Lawler = 59
Robert = 18+15+2+5+18+20 = 78 (Robbie = 18+15+2+2+9+5 = 51)
Glenn = 7+12+5+14+14 = 52
Lawler = 12+1+23+12+5+18 = 71
Robert Glenn Lawler = 201
Robbie Lawler = 122
Robbie's nickname is 'Ruthless'. The last major fight at the MGM was between Pacquio and Mayweather, May 2, 2015, the 122nd day of the year. That was a fight that went to decision.
Ruthless = 18+21+20+8+12+5+19+19 = 122
3/20/1982 = 3+20+(1+9+8+2) = 43
3/20/1982 = 3+2+0+1+9+8+2 = 25
3/20/82 = 3+20+82 = 105
Notice that Lawler is currently 33-years old.
He will turn 34 in 78-days, matching the gematria of 'Robert'. After the Conor McGregor fight, we saw how birthdays and UFC fights can be aligned. Is this fight setup for Rawler, coming 78-days before his 34th birthday?
His last fight was July 11 against Rory MacDonald, which he won. He has won his last 4 fights. The last time he lost was March 15, 2014, on the 74th day of the year, against Johnny Hendricks, who he defeated in the rematch, December 6, 2014.
His last fight was 175-days ago, or 25-weeks.
His fights can be examined here.
http://www.sherdog.com/fighter/Robbie-Lawler-2245
Because he is currently 33-years old, Robbie Rawler might be ripe for a loss, but then again his opponent has the '33' connection as well. This number often show up around sacrifice.
Now let us examine Carlos Condit.
Carlos = 3+1+9+3+6+1 = 23/32
Joseph = 1+6+1+5+7+8 = 28/37
Condit = 3+6+5+4+9+2 = 29
Carlos Joseph Condit = 80/98
Carlos Condit = 52/61
Carlos = 3+1+18+12+15+19 = 68
Joseph = 10+15+19+5+16+8 = 73
Condit = 3+15+14+4+9+20 = 65
Carlos Joseph Condit = 206
Carlos Condit = 133
4/26/1984 = 4+26+19+84 = 133 (Carlos Condit = 133)
4/26/1984 = 4+26+(1+9+8+4) = 52
4/26/1984 = 4+2+6+1+9+8+4 = 34
4/26/84 = 4+26+84 = 114
Notice that Condit is currently 31-years old. The ranging degrees of Scottish Rite Freemasonry are 31-33, like the ages of the fighters. Let us not overlook the CC, 33, initials of Carlos Condit,
Carlos was born April 26, 1984, the 116th day of the year, except in leap years, which he was born, so in '84, it was the 117th day. It is interesting to note that his opponent, Rawler, last fought on July 11, written as 11/7 in most parts of the world.
There is no alignment with his birthday and this fight, as there is for Rawler.
Condit is currently 30-8, meaning today will be his 39th fight, on a date with 39 numerology. The last time he fought, he won, May 30, 2015. That fight was 217-days ago, or 31-weeks, matching his current age, 31. His fight prior to that, he lost, March 15, 2014, the 74th day of the year, the same day Rawler last lost.
Because this is Condit's 39th fight, coming on the date with '39' numerology, and because he hasn't been fighting that much lately, it seems things are lined up for him to win, defeating the 33-year old. That said, he has lost the majority of his fights lately, and it is also possible he was saved as the bait for Rawler for this evening's fight. Time will tell.
http://www.sherdog.com/fighter/Carlos-Condit-6765
One last point, UFC FOX 17 was centered around the number '66', and the center of the ring was an advertisement for UFC 195. Revelation, the 66th Book of the Bible, is based on the 39-Books of the Old Testament. Based on the fighter's histories, this should last more than 39 seconds... I'd expect several rounds at least, possibly a decision.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.