Thursday, February 20, 2014

33 Watch: Miranda "Rights" | Assassinated by 44, 44

You've likely heard the phrase 'Miranda Rights' before. They're rights for the person in police custody; where they must, prior to interrogation, be clearly informed they have the right to remain silent and that anything the person says will be used against that person in court; the person must be clearly informed that he/she has the right to consult with an attorney and to have that attorney present during questioning, and that, if he/she is indigent, an attorney will be provided at no cost to represent him/her.

The concept of "Miranda rights" was enshrined in U.S. law following the 1966 Miranda vs Arizona Supreme Court decision, which found that the Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights of Ernesto Arturo Miranda had been violated during his arrest and trial for armed robbery, kidnapping, and rape of a mentally handicapped young woman. (Miranda was subsequently retried and convicted.)
  • Ernesto = 5+9+5+5+1+2+6 = 33
  • Arturo = 30
  • Miranda = 4+9+9+1+5+4+1 = 33
  • Ernesto Arturo Miranda = 33+30+33 = 96
  • Scottish Rite Freemasonry; 31-33
  • 31+32+33 = 96
  • Also, please notice this case happened in '66
  • Further, the Miranda story takes place in Phoenix, AZ, located on the 33rd Parallel North
On June 1, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled on Berghuis vs Thompkins case.  In this decision, the United States Supreme Court declared that criminal defendants who have been read the Miranda rights (and who have indicated they understand them and have not already waived them), must explicitly state during or before an interrogation begins that they wish to be silent and not speak to police for that protection against self-incrimination to apply. If they speak to police about the incident before invoking the Miranda right to remain silent, or afterwards at any point during the interrogation or detention, the words they speak may be used against them if they have not stated they do not want to speak to police. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion and was joined by Justices Scalia, Alito, and Thomas and by Chief Justice Roberts. Justices Sotomayor, Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer dissented.
  • Berghuis = 2+5+9+7+8+3+9+1 = 44
  • Thompkins = 2+8+6+4+7+2+9+5+1 = 44
If you read this blog, you are well aware of the theory that has been put forth about the number 44 by myself.  From my research, it is a number that has much to do with assassination, and in this case, the Berghuis vs Thompkins decision assassinated Miranda Rights, at least as we knew them.

Interestingly enough, in Bangladesh, the equivalent of the Miranda Rights, is known as Article 33 of the Constitution of Bangladesh.  Courtesy of Wikipedia, Article 33 of the Constitution of Bangladesh compels arresting authorities to inform the accused of the accusations brought against him before he is detained,[111] and that the detained must be presented to the nearest court within 24 hours.[111] Exceptions to this rule include preventive detention and the arrest of an enemy alien.[111] Right to counsel is an inalienable right, but the arresting officer need not explicitly state it to the detained.

It is important to keep in mind that Miranda Rights are for incidents involving the Police, another word that is a coded 33.
  • Police = 7+6+3+9+3+5 = 33
There is also a connection between the state of Arizona, and the birth of Ernesto Miranda, quite likely, a fictional character.
  • Arizona = 1+9+9+8+6+5+1 = 39
  • Ernesto Miranda was born 3/9/1941; notice the 3/9, or 39
  • 3+9+1+9+4+1 = 27 (The life number of many Rockstars who died at age "27")
  • Rockstar = 9+6+3+2+1+2+1+9 = 33
  • Code Name = 3+6+4+5+5+1+4+5 = 33
  • Ernesto Miranda died on 1/31/1976; notice the 131 and year '76
  • 1+3+1+1+9+7+6 = 28 (28-years is a full "solar-cycle")
The date of the arrest has the "God Gematria" of "26", and the date of the Supreme Court decision has the "America/UK" Gematria of "32", which also matches the date of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.
  • Arrest:  March 13, 1963 (3+1+3+1+9+6+3 = 26)
  • SC Decision:  June 13, 1966 (6+1+3+1+9+6+6 = 32)
  • 7/4/1776 (7+4+1+7+7+6 = 32); UK = 32; America = 32
The case was argued from February 28, 1966 to March 1, 1966. (...The day after 2/27?)
  • 2/28/1966 = 2+2+8+1+9+6+6 = 34 (The ninth fibonacci number)
  • 3/1/1966 = 3+1+1+9+6+6 = 26 (The God Number, like the date of the arrest)

1 comment:

  1. After being in relationship with Wilson for seven years,he broke up with me, I did everything possible to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so much because of the love I have for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused. I explained my problem to someone online and she suggested that I should contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back but I am the type that don't believed in spell, I had no choice than to try it, I meant a spell caster called Dr Zuma zuk and I email him, and he told me there was no problem that everything will be okay before three days, that my ex will return to me before three days, he cast the spell and surprisingly in the second day, it was around 4pm. My ex called me, I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that he was so sorry for everything that happened, that he wanted me to return to him, that he loves me so much. I was so happy and went to him, that was how we started living together happily again. Since then, I have made promise that anybody I know that have a relationship problem, I would be of help to such person by referring him or her to the only real and powerful spell caster who helped me with my own problem and who is different from all the fake ones out there. Anybody could need the help of the spell caster, his email: or call him +2349055637784 you can email him if you need his assistance in your relationship or anything. CONTACT HIM NOW FOR SOLUTION TO ALL YOUR PROBLEMS'


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.